首页> 外文OA文献 >Transnational political action and 'global civil society' in practice: the case of Oxfam
【2h】

Transnational political action and 'global civil society' in practice: the case of Oxfam

机译:跨国政治行动和“全球公民社会”在实践中:乐施会的案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The term 'global civil society' has taken on increasing significance within scholarly debate over the past decade. This paper seeks to understand transnational political agency via the study of a particular transnational actor, Oxfam. It argues that the various schools of thought surrounding the global civil society concept, in particular the prevailing liberal-cosmopolitan approach, are unable to conceptualise transnational political action in practice – due largely, in the case of liberal-cosmopolitanism, to a shared normative agenda. It also assesses the contribution of the literature on development and civil society to the analysis of groups such as Oxfam. In investigating Oxfam's own perceptions of its context and the meanings of its agency, we discover an anti-political perspective, derived from an encounter between Oxfam's long-standing commitment to liberal internationalism, and globalization discourse. The local or parochial nature of global civil society actors' identities has not been sufficiently identified by existing scholarship.
机译:在过去的十年中,“全球公民社会”一词在学术辩论中的意义日益重大。本文旨在通过对特定的跨国演员乐施会的研究来了解跨国政治机构。它辩称,围绕全球公民社会概念的各种思想流派,特别是流行的自由主义-世界主义方法,在实践中无法概念化跨国政治行动,这在很大程度上是因为自由主义-世界主义的情况是基于共同的规范性议程。它还评估了有关发展和公民社会的文献对乐施会等群体的分析的贡献。在调查乐施会自己对它的背景及其代理机构的含义的看法时,我们发现了一种反政治的观点,这一观点源于乐施会对自由国际主义的长期承诺与全球化话语之间的相遇。现有的奖学金尚未充分确定全球公民社会行为者身份的地​​方性或狭nature性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Berry, Craig; Gabay, Clive;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号